compiler: text keys' follow-up (Master's rulings) - a Key in a template literal's hole is an error (the parser marks each hole's string(), TPL_HOLE; write trf(k"...", ...)), trn takes only a plural key kn"..." and tr / trf refuse one (with or without en.po), and a program with no lang line (a package test) uses key literals unchecked and silently - the warning stays for a lang line whose en.po is missing; rejected/i18n_keys gains key_hole (2) and key_rules (3), key_missing's plural moves to trn; LANGUAGE.md and the changeset say so; reseeded, bootstrap-cfree fixpoint holds
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
66b8e51026
commit
9f9ac4a7ce
13 changed files with 72839 additions and 72164 deletions
|
|
@ -11,3 +11,6 @@ holes, text still written in English (a template's words, a `@Text` row's value
|
|||
`english_left` by `ludic deps`) and one English split into keys without `#.` descriptions are
|
||||
warnings. `ludic schema` gains `"lang"`: every key with its sites, unused and undescribed keys, splits,
|
||||
and each other language's missing, fuzzy and extra keys.
|
||||
A `Key` in a template literal's hole is an error (write `trf(k"...", ...)`), `trn` takes only a plural
|
||||
key and `tr` / `trf` refuse one; a program with no `lang` line (a package test) uses key literals
|
||||
unchecked and silently.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue